A Critical Review of a Popular Anti-Catholic Pamphlet
What would you do if you discovered the majority of the bad things you were
taught about Catholicism were incorrect and meant to deceive you?
The pamphlet “Rome vs the Bible” has many factual
errors both blatant and more subtle. In
discovering these errors, will you continue to spread them, or correct them?
Authority
"Rome
vs the Bible" (RvB) claims that
"the Bible teaches Scripture has authority over the church" and cites
2Tim3:16. RvB then claims "Catholicism teaches the Church has authority
over Scriptures" and cites the Catholic Catechism (CCC) paragraphs 100 and
119.
Also 2 Tim 3:16 says nothing about the
church. It merely shows the high
authority, inerrancy and inspiration of Scripture , something that Catholicism
teaches (101-141). But is that the only
thing that has authority according to Scripture?
Ask yourself: what do I believe has the
authority to decide between arguing Christians?
What do I believe is the pillar and
foundation of truth for the Christian?
What did God plan to use, from the
beginning of time, to make known His entire wisdom?
RvB
would like you to believe it is The
Bible.
Reality shows, according to that Bible, it is:
The
Church (Mt 18:15-18; 1Tim3:15; Eph 3:10)
Salvation / Justification
RvB implicitly denies that one can lose salvation. RvB then
derides Catholicism for believing in Mortal sin and the ability to lose
salvation.
Reality shows that the Bible explicity teaches there is Mortal sin, or the “sins that lead to death” ('death' = 'mortal' in Latin)(1Jn5:17) meaning a spiritual death. The Bible teaches that a Christian can, indeed, lose salvation through sinning. Take heed you who think you stand secure, lest you fall. (1Cor 10:6-8; 11-12) (Rom 11:22; Gal 5:6; 2 Pet 2:20-22) RvB doesn’t address these verses. Why not?
RvB
states “man is Justified once by
faith”. RvB then condemns Catholicism for teaching that Salvation and
Justification are a process, with a one-time event to begin them, but then
cooperation needed to continue progressing in them.
Reality shows the Bible says both Salvation and Justification are processes with a past completed event (Rom 8:24; Eph 2:5-8 etc), present application (1Cor1:8; 2Cor2:15; Phil 2:12), and future cooperation needed to get to heaven (Rom 5:9-10; 1Cor 3:12-15).RvB doesn’t address the rest of these Biblical passages. Why not?
RvB
implies that faith alone is what
saves someone and works will come afterward, but does not have anything to do
with salvation. RvB then claims Catholicism teaches that one can earn “their own
salvation” through good works.
RvB again does not report accurate Catholic
teaching. Why not?
Reality
shows the Bible teaches we are saved
by Grace which no one can earn (Eph 2:8-9).
But once we are “in Christ” we are commanded to do good works (Eph
2:10). If we disobey this command, we
cannot be saved (Jn 3:36); If we rely only on faith, without good works, that
faith cannot save us. Good works
complete our faith, as it did with Abraham, and therefore it was credited to
him as righteousness. Just as a body
cannot be alive first and the soul comes later, faith without good works is
dead. The only place in Scripture the
phrase “Faith Alone” appears it says: We
are justified by works and NOT BY FAITH ALONE (Ja
2:14-24).
RvB neglects to mention any of these Bible passages. Why not?
Baptism
RvB states that only the Holy Spirit regenerates people. RvB then implies that Catholicism is opposed to this by teaching Baptism regenerates people.
Reality
is that Catholicism teaches Christ
empowered Baptism to bring the Holy Spirit, which is why it regenerates people
(1225; 1987; 2017).
Reality shows that Christ said exactly that. (Jn3:5) Reality also shows that the Bible teaches Baptism is necessary for salvation and forgives sins (1Pet 3:21-22; Act 2:38-39
RvB
again fails to give accurate representation of Catholicism and ignores
Scripture. Why?
Eucharist / The Lord's Supper
RvB
states, “the Lord’s Supper is a memorial”
implying an intellectual recollection only and cites 1Cor11:24-25. RvB then
implies that the Catholic Mass is re-sacrificing Christ.
Reality shows that the word for “remembrance” (anamnesis) means making a past event present today. Also the word for “do” implies sacrifice. Christ also said, “This IS my Body” and “This IS my Blood” not "this represents" (Lk 22:19-20; paralleled in Mk, Mt; 1Cor11:24-25). Christ also commands us to “Eat My Flesh” and “Drink My Blood” numerous times using language that can only be interpreted literally without doing violence to the text. (Jn 6:51-56). Paul also tells us this is a literal participation in Christ's Body and Blood (1 Cor 10:16) and to receive without discerning Christ's Body, is to be guilty of His literal Body and Blood i.e. of murder (1 Cor 10:27-30).
Reality is Catholicism teaches Christ’s sacrifice was Once-For-All, and the Eucharist is making that One Sacrifice present today (re-presenting) (1362-1363).
Reality also is all Christians writings from the first EIGHT CENTURIES taught the literal interpretation of Christ’s words. One cannot find a single Christian writer who states what RvB believes about the Lord’s Supper for 800 years after Christ’s Ascension.
Reality also shows RvB's idea of "the Lord's Supper" was made up by men in the 16th Century. A warning from Scripture is appropriate here: Gal 1:8.
Anathemas
Anathema merely means to not belong to the community. RvB would like you to believe it means "condemned to hell."
RvB's
own teachings (Faith Alone, Scripture
Alone, Symbolic Only Lord's Supper, Once Saved Always Saved, the Rapture etc) were made up
by men in the 16th Century or later. Protestant Historians like JMD Kelly acknowledge
this.
RvB's own warning (Gal 1:6-9)
applies to them, not to the Catholic Church whose biblical teachings have
stayed consistnent for 2000 years. One
only need to read the writings of the students of the Apostles to see this is
true.
By believing - and pushing - these brand new, non-biblical teachings RvB proves they 'do not belong' to the Church Christ founded.
Saints / Priests
RvB claims that Catholicism doesn’t teach that all Christians are priests and saints.
Reality: The Catholic Church explicitly teaches the priesthood of all believers and that all Christians are saints (priesthood: 1141; 1268; 1546 / saints: 946-962). RvB did not bother to take 10 seconds on a internet search to find this out. Why Not?
Reality: Recognizing what Scripture tells us, Catholicism
teaches Christ also set up a ministerial
priesthood by giving it much of His Authority (Lk 10:16; Jn 20:21-23 cf. 2Cor
5:18; Mt:18:18 and many others) and that the “Holy Ones” in heaven (1 Thes
3:13) (the Latin word ‘holy’ is where ‘saint’ comes from) / the souls of Just
men made perfect can now, because of Christ, be address and approached (Heb
12:22-24). Since: the Church is the Body
of Christ(Col 1:18); Christ only has one Body, not multiple (1Cor 12:12); Death
cannot separate us from Christ (Rom 8:37-38); and we, in Christ, are commanded
to pray for one another (1Tim2:1-4), therefore those members of the Church in
Heaven are praying for us, and presenting our prayers before the Throne of God
(Rev 5:8).
RvB does not present the full Biblical picture and presents a completely FALSE representation of Catholic teaching. WHY?
Final Thoughts
RvB does NOT want to present accurate Catholic teaching, nor the full Biblical teaching on these topics. WHY?
They have believed the Traditions of Men: Martin Luther, John Calvin, Ulrich Zwingli, John Smyth, John Wesley, and the tens of thousands after them. They have not held fast to the Traditions of God, which includes Sacred Scripture, (2Thes2:15; 3:6; 1Thes3:13; 2Tim2:2; 1Cor11:2) passed on faithfully for 2000 years by the Catholic Church!
We
encourage you to read your denomination's teaching charters / documents /
confessionals and compare them to 1)
History: the writings of the 1st Christians after the Apostles 2) The WHOLE
Bible 3) The Catechism of the Catholic Church.
We welcome your charitable comments or questions.
Fidei Defensor
Bulk pamphlets available upon request.Pamphlets coming soon: Sola Scriptura vs the Bible, History and Logic; Sola Fide vs the Bible; Protestantism vs. the Bible and History.
Spare me your foolish comments on the validity of the Catholic Eucharist.
ReplyDeleteNow for a wake-up call with 100 reasons why Transubstantiation is a pseudo-intellectual fraud, you may request that essay at...eucharistangel@icloud.com